A Comparison of the Methods of the Suffragists and the...

A Comparison of the Methods of the Suffragists and the Suffragettes There were two main groups in Britain during the early 20th century who were both fighting for the same cause, women’s suffrage. Although in the end they both wanted the same outcome, they went about trying to win the vote in completely different ways. the first group to be established lead by Millicent Fawcett were the suffragists, they were made up of mainly middle class well educated women, and the suffragists believed the best way to get the vote was through peaceful tactics such as petitions and peaceful marches. Groups began to set up all over the country showing their support for this movement, and eventually the unified in†¦show more content†¦They had completely different ideas about how to gain suffrage for women; they believed that the peaceful, very proper campaign being used by the suffragists was going nowhere fast. So they believed that they needed to do something different they chose to try and gain suffrage by any means possible whether it was lega l or illegal, as they felt any actions were justifiable in their fight for the suffrage they felt women deserved. A significant example of this is when Emmeline’s daughter christabel spat in a policeman’s face, she was subsequently arrested tried and sentenced to a custodial sentence which is what she wanted as it gained huge publicity for their cause but it was bad publicity society in general was outraged at what this woman had done. They saw any publicity as good publicity, as it put their issue in the public eye. The suffragists always used the same method, a peaceful protest. They would create petitions, hand out leaflets, they would politely ask MP’s to attend their lobbies and meetings and listen to their thoughts. They believed their peaceful protest and strength of argument would win over the support of the men in high up places and therefore give them what they wanted. On the other hand the suffragettes had a much more intense wayShow MoreRelatedHigher History Women1700 Words   |  7 Pagesbetter educated and get involved in politics. However, this view that the New Women was the only factor that contributed to women getting the vote is untrue. Women began their own campaigns in order to get the vote. This included the Suffragists and the Suffragettes as both organisations were tired of being ignored and seen as undeservingof the vote. Furthermore, another addition to the factors is the Reward Theory. Women during World War 1 became greatly involved in helping Britain in the warRead MoreThe Importance of the First World War in Achieving Votes for Women in 1918907 Words   |  4 Pagesthe response of Suffragettes and Suffragists in supporting the war effort. Although, this may seem to be a believable explanation, it should be noted that the response of the womens suffrage movement was varied. This means it is important to see how the WSPU and NUWSS helped women gain the vote. When war was declared, the WSPU suspended suffrage activities, telling its members to support the vote effort. therefore, the WSPU abandoned their violent methods and began demonstratingRead MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagesspecialize in one or the other of what have been viewed as very different wars, Morrow not only compares the two conflicts in detail, but also approaches each war and its linkages from a thoroughly global perspective. This combination of rigorous comparison and breadth allows him to repeatedly challenge longestablished myths, provide alternatives to narrowly conceived interpretations, and offer quite an original take on the most extensively covered conflicts in human history and the decades of unprecedented